14 years ago
Anonymous
Is rolling back Bush's extremely generous tax cuts for the rich and asking them to pay their share "Socialism"?
Have I got this right cons, after all the coddling and breaks the wealthy have gotten from Reagan and Bush, it's now considered "Socialism" to get them to pony up their share of taxes for a change instead of shaking down the middle class until all the loose change has been extracted from them?
14 years ago
Anonymous
Favorite Answer
Well if you want to go back to double digit inflation, gas lines and unemployment like we had under Carter I hope you are ready to figure out how you are going to keep your house warm and buy food.
2
14 years ago
Turd Ferguson
Why don't the poor pay their share? They are the ones getting govt help and they don't pay a dime for it. That is total bull ****. Go to school, get a job and stop crapping out babies like you have diarrhea.
1
14 years ago
Who Else?
No, it's sweet revenge - these supposedly "patriotic" right-wingers haven't paid their fair share for a long time, and the country finally woke up to the scam they've been perpetrating on the rest of us. I'm gonna laugh in their angry faces every time they gripe about paying their taxes like everybody else.
1
14 years ago
Anonymous
Yes. American corporations are taxed the second highest in the world. I'd say they already pay their fair share.
1
14 years ago
jeeper_peeper321
What exactly is the rich's fair share ?
Care to put a number on it ?
A percentage ?
1
14 years ago
Anonymous
I guess so, they'll only pay for it with our bailout dollars anyway, so I guess when we end up paying their losses, yes, it is socialism. They go to their social events while we work for the pittance they see fit to pay us.
1
14 years ago
Anonymous
I see that negativism has rolled its tanks into your camp as well.
...wait, I thought Obama said the Democrats were pristine and clean when it came to negative politics!?!
2
